<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:evnet="http://www.mscommunities.com/rssmodule/"><channel><title>Comment Feed for New for Photogs: Pro Photo Tools V1 (sarahintampa on Channel 10)</title><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://www.on10.net/blogs/sarahintampa/new-for-photogs-pro-photo-tools-v1/rss/default.aspx" /><description>New for Photogs: Pro Photo Tools V1</description><link>http://on10.net/blogs/sarahintampa/New-for-Photogs-Pro-Photo-Tools-V1/</link><language>en-us</language><pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 23:34:37 GMT</pubDate><lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 23:34:37 GMT</lastBuildDate><generator>EvNet (EvNet, Version=1.0.3143.743, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null)</generator><item><title>Re: New for Photogs: Pro Photo Tools V1</title><description>What happened to Microsoft going 64bit? How can they release a product that does not work on Vista x64?!?!?!?</description><comments></comments><link>http://on10.net/blogs/sarahintampa/New-for-Photogs-Pro-Photo-Tools-V1/?CommentID=22272</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 23:34:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">http://on10.net/blogs/sarahintampa/New-for-Photogs-Pro-Photo-Tools-V1/?CommentID=22272</guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://on10.net/22272/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>What happened to Microsoft going 64bit? How can they release a product that does not work on Vista x64?!?!?!?</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>tolcheen</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://on10.net/22272/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Re: New for Photogs: Pro Photo Tools V1</title><description>Does not run on Vista x64 :(((</description><comments></comments><link>http://on10.net/blogs/sarahintampa/New-for-Photogs-Pro-Photo-Tools-V1/?CommentID=22262</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 18:06:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">http://on10.net/blogs/sarahintampa/New-for-Photogs-Pro-Photo-Tools-V1/?CommentID=22262</guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://on10.net/22262/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Does not run on Vista x64 :(((</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>RunneR</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://on10.net/22262/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Re: Re: New for Photogs: Pro Photo Tools V1</title><description>Happy to&amp;nbsp;pass along your feedback. Off the top of my head, though, I have to think that keeping a new initiative like this uncoupled from a product like Live Photo Gallery will allow them explore every avenue they want without being wed to the Live Photo Gallery roadmap.</description><comments></comments><link>http://on10.net/blogs/sarahintampa/New-for-Photogs-Pro-Photo-Tools-V1/?CommentID=22261</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 17:59:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">http://on10.net/blogs/sarahintampa/New-for-Photogs-Pro-Photo-Tools-V1/?CommentID=22261</guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://on10.net/22261/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>Happy to&amp;nbsp;pass along your feedback. Off the top of my head, though, I have to think that keeping a new initiative like this uncoupled from a product like Live Photo Gallery will allow them explore every avenue they want without being wed to the Live Photo Gallery roadmap.</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://on10.net/22261/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Re: New for Photogs: Pro Photo Tools V1</title><description>You're right. Instead of coming out with all these separate products they would be better off integrating it with the products people already use like Live Photo Gallery.</description><comments></comments><link>http://on10.net/blogs/sarahintampa/New-for-Photogs-Pro-Photo-Tools-V1/?CommentID=22258</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 12:20:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">http://on10.net/blogs/sarahintampa/New-for-Photogs-Pro-Photo-Tools-V1/?CommentID=22258</guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://on10.net/22258/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>You're right. Instead of coming out with all these separate products they would be better off integrating it with the products people already use like Live Photo Gallery.</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>dentaku</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://on10.net/22258/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item><item><title>Re: New for Photogs: Pro Photo Tools V1</title><description>These "Pro" Tools do a good job at the few functions they do. But the thing is, is that they only have a few functions.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Why not integrate this with Live/Vista Photo Gallery? Or actually making a more better high-end photo editing software? Makes more sense to me.</description><comments></comments><link>http://on10.net/blogs/sarahintampa/New-for-Photogs-Pro-Photo-Tools-V1/?CommentID=22253</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 23:57:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">http://on10.net/blogs/sarahintampa/New-for-Photogs-Pro-Photo-Tools-V1/?CommentID=22253</guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://on10.net/22253/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>These "Pro" Tools do a good job at the few functions they do. But the thing is, is that they only have a few functions.Why not integrate this with Live/Vista Photo Gallery? Or actually making a more better high-end photo editing software? Makes more sense to me.</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>quikboy</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://on10.net/22253/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item></channel></rss>